Through the present period of globalization, the notion of a state fails to be restricted inside the official bounds of its borders and expands past its geophysical place. Analysis has argued the fluidity and adaptability of nationwide id on account of diasporas (Adamson & Demteriou, 2007, p. 505). By sustaining shut relations between each nation of origin (COO) and nation of residence (COR), diasporas have managed to advertise a transnational dimension as to how states have interaction with their publics, on account of their various, globalized identities (Adamson & Demetriou, 2007, p. 498). The ever-increasing position of diasporas thus turns into a geopolitical quest on how such teams could be utilized to profit each nations. One such instance is diplomatic practices. The usage of public diplomacy might thus be useful, as these participating in Public Diplomacy “typically transcend [the definitions and practices] related to diplomacy” (Huijgh, 2016). One subcategory is diaspora diplomacy, outlined as “participating a rustic’s abroad neighborhood to contribute to constructing relationships with international nation” (Rana, 2013, p. 70).

The rising literature has mentioned quite a few teams which have engaged in diaspora diplomacy and the assorted methods they tried to take action. Regardless that analysis has recognized a number of ethnic teams, one nonetheless stays comparatively unseen within the related literature: the Greeks. The newest migration disaster sparked an enormous response from the Greek diaspora on social media, together with an urge to Secretary of State Pompeo to help Greece (Hellenic American Management Council, 2020), indicating the energetic position of the Greek diaspora. Evidently, analysis continues to be restricted, and extra data is important. The current essay seeks to look at how Greek-Individuals entered diaspora diplomacy each for and by their nation, whereas enhancing the present diplomatic literature. The primary half will study the theoretical framework; the second half will present background data on the invasion of Cyprus, a crucial level in Greek diasporic historical past, and study how the US and Greek-Individuals reacted to the invasion and at last, the final half will analyze how the practices of the Greek diaspora on the time could be labeled as diaspora diplomacy. The current essay seeks to position the literature on Greek diaspora when it comes to diaspora diplomacy, because the latter idea had not developed on the time of the occasions.

The Theoretical Idea of Diaspora Diplomacy

Diasporas are uniquely located by advantage of their place. Their twin id in two completely different nations permits them to have the ability to join and perceive each (Brinkerhoff, 2019, p. 58). This twin character offers a major benefit as “they’ve seen the long run and may ‘translate’ the concepts” (Brinkerhoff, 2019, p. 60). Lastly, Brinkerhoff argues {that a} crucial benefit is their response to world political crises, as they will mobilize extra governments and conduct focused public diplomacy by way of their twin identities (Brinkerhoff, 2019, p. 59-60). In an effort to obtain the complete potential of their distinctive place, diasporas have numerous aims. These embrace enhancing the pictures of every nation to the residents of the opposite; lobbying for the help of COR in points referring to the COO; aiding the commerce between the 2 nations and at last aiding newcomers within the COR (Brinkerhoff, 2019, p. 53). By participating in these actions, the diasporas can bridge a powerful relation between the 2 nations. To know how that happens, we are going to study the idea set forth by Ho and McConnell (2017).

The authors mixed analysis on diaspora and diplomatic research to look at “their convergence” and emphasize the “multidirectional” character of diaspora diplomacy (Ho & McConnell, 2017). They argue that diasporas “could be referred to as on to conduct excessive stage diplomatic negotiations” and “affect home and international coverage agendas of their COO” (Ho & McConnell, 2017, p. 237), indicating the multivariate character and use diasporas can have. Two primary forms of routes are proposed to explicate how diasporas go about finishing the aforementioned aims: diplomacy by way of (DTD) and by (DBD) diaspora (Ho and McConnell, 2017, p. 237). The previous refers to “how they perform as diplomatic actors and have the power to have interaction with numerous diplomatic stakeholders” whereas the latter refers to “diplomatic actions to advance various political visions,” particularly advocacy, mediation and illustration (Ho & McConnell, 2017, p. 237).

DTD is utilized primarily by the nation of origin to advertise its picture, improve cultural diplomacy and facilitate relations between the 2 nations (Ho & McConnell, 2017, p. 241). In consequence, most focus is on participating Nye’s idea of sentimental energy and cooperation (Ho & McConnell, 2017 p. 242). It have to be famous that beliefs of diasporas can be out of sync with COO, and thus they conduct diaspora diplomacy individually from their state, e.g. by cooperating with the CORs. The latter use migrants who’ve returned to COO to affect the house nation and promote the pursuits of the receiving state. Via DBD, however, diasporas can perform as unbiased actors and use diplomatic practices that additional their very own agendas (Ho & McConnell, 2017, p. 245). Their major features are to advocate for home and international insurance policies that have an effect on the COO or COR, act as mediators throughout inside political crises and at last can act as representatives of these in exile (Ho & McConnell, 2017).

In an effort to higher comprehend how diaspora diplomacy features, two examples could be examined. Rana (2009) carried out in depth analysis on how India makes use of its huge communities world wide. India has developed a big agenda on the best way to use these diasporic communities and promotes it although annual conferences (Rana, 2009, p. 366). Via official ministerial workplaces, they guarantee the protection and well-being of their diasporas overseas, whereas enhancing methods of their integration to the society of the COR (Rana, 2009). These communities are then used to determine bilateral relations and improve ties between the 2 nations (Rana, 2009, p. 367). Moreover, the Australian authorities has established a person group that caters on to diaspora communities, creating a big community exterior of Australia. The group is used to create sure narratives surrounding Australia and to carry Australian initiatives to a worldwide stage (Stone and Douglas, 2018). The current paper will use Ho and McConnell’s strategy of analyzing diaspora diplomacy by analyzing literature of diaspora research. The next part will present a small introduction to the battle that sparked the diplomatic practices of Greek diaspora and will probably be adopted by the practices that initiated the method.

Greece, US Pursuits and the Invasion of Cyprus

In 1974, the Greek army coup tried to overthrow the Cypriot President Makarios, in an effort to carry to energy a extra union-friendly authorities, leading to an invasion from Turkey (Miller, 2009). In consequence, each Greece and Turkey mobilized and ready for a possible outbreak of a warfare within the area (Kaloudis, 2018, p. 180). General, the invasion sharply elevated tensions within the area, but American pursuits within the area contrasted native ones.

All through the earlier years, the Greek Junta maintained shut relations with the US by way of establishing packages with the CIA and the Pentagon and making a pleasant local weather for American companies (Sakkas, 2004, p. 205). The US had very important pursuits within the area, together with Greece, Turkey and Cyprus, and supported a powerful presence of NATO within the space (Sakkas, 2004, p. 256). As a result of significance of the realm in relation to the USSR, Individuals wanted the army bases for the strategic place within the Mediterranean, and the army dictatorship did all the pieces of their energy to permit that (Sakkas, 2004, p. 248). Nevertheless, the US was removed from being goal, despite the fact that the State Division denied any data of the coup and promotion of the invasion based on a recent supply (Coufoudakis, 1977 p. 262). In reality, the US had offered weapons used within the invasion to Turkey (Kaloudis, 2018, p.162). The American involvement and the perpetrator had been ample for the Greek neighborhood within the US to turn into actively concerned. The next part will study how the Greek diaspora acted within the warfare.

“Nothing mobilized the Greeks of diaspora […] because the Turkish invasion of Cyprus” (Kaloudis 2008, p. 40). Earlier than that, the Greek neighborhood within the US was largely uninvolved in US politics, partly as a consequence of the truth that many teachers and intellectuals had been exiled as a result of dictatorship (Prévélakis, 2000, p. 179). Kaloudis additional argues that causes for the Greeks to remain out of American politics included their hope of returning dwelling, their disbelief in opposition to unions and the restrictions positioned by their religious-ethnic id (Kaloudis, 2018, p. 162). Nevertheless, the Turkish invasion proved a major drive that motivated the Greek communities to enter the polity en masse (Karpathakis, 1999; Prévélakis, 2000; Kaloudis, 2008; Kaloudis, 2018). As a response to the invasion, and in hopes that the US authorities would change its place, Greeks from all around the US gathered in DC to protest and place strain on Congress (Kaloudis, 2018, p. 186). Moreover, the neighborhood turned to nationwide and native politicians of each events to foyer for the Greek trigger, whereas they tried the Americanization of the neighborhood to include the immigrants into the polity and affect international coverage (Karpathakis, 1999, p. 57). Concurrently, massive Greek organizations just like the Panhellenic Emergency Committee and the United Hellenic Affiliation enacted important mobilizations to affect the congress in the direction of Greek-friendly insurance policies (Kaloudis, 2018, p. 188). Lastly, the leaders of the communities started forging relations with politicians, reminding them of their voting energy, and increasing their community by way of fundraisers (Karpathakis, 1999). The mass mobilization led to the creation of the “Greek Foyer,” which in flip pressed for a Congressional embargo on Turkey (Kaloudis, 2018).


The response, and eventual motion, of the Greek-Individuals through the mid-Nineteen Seventies is carefully associated to the idea set forth within the first part. The onset of the Greek diaspora diplomacy can in no way be described as DTD, however quite DBD. The diaspora had a disconnect with not solely the altering Greek authorities, but additionally the “State Division of Kissinger post-Watergate” (Kaloudis, 2008, p. 42). Ho and McConnell additionally argued that “diasporas act nationalistic and promote extremism and radical agendas” (Ho & McConnell, 2017, p. 246). The Greek-American perspective in the direction of the dictatorship sparked nice divisions amongst them (Kaloudis, 2008, p.40), resulting in an absence of consensus and consequently inaction. Nonetheless, Greeks united in opposition to the worry of a Turkish invasion in Greece, illustrating the long-standing nationalist ingredient of Greeks.

Moreover, trying additional into how diaspora diplomacy developed onwards from 1975, it’s clear that many traits could be assigned to diaspora diplomacy. For instance, Kaloudis (2008) emphasizes how Greek-Individuals developed their very own id that was separate from these left behind. This resulted in conditions the place the one group typically failed to grasp the opposite as a result of completely different trajectories every neighborhood had adopted (Kaloudis, 2008, p. 48). This instantly pertains to Brinkerhoff’s emphasis of a twin id. The Greek diaspora has managed to create a separate id that lies in a limbo between the US and Greece and will thus affect each by way of its connecting factors with every. The binary place is additional examined within the Greek Individuals’ failure to completely assimilate into American society by sidelining the home points, however quite utilizing Greek points to enter the native politics and preserve a “binational id” (Karpathakis 1999, p. 55).

Lastly, the quick response of the communities virtually follows the definitions of literature. The Greeks massively lobbied for Greek pursuits within the Congress, assisted within the integration of newcomers to advertise their agenda, adopted an unbiased agenda from each the Greek and the US authorities and tried to advocate for the advantages of their COO. Regardless that their early makes an attempt largely didn’t have any diplomatic tact, Greek-Individuals entered US polity for the only real objective of selling the aims described 40 years later as diaspora diplomacy.

Concluding, analysis in diaspora diplomacy, despite the fact that nonetheless weak, focuses on how diasporas are utilized by the governments of the COO and COR to advertise the advantages of every to the opposite. Diasporas typically act of their very own volition as representatives of their communities of origin in an try to help the COO. This was the case of the Greek diaspora within the US. Analysis on how the Greek diaspora makes use of its twin id to advertise American and Greek pursuits has been very restricted within the discipline of diaspora diplomacy. Nevertheless, in depth analysis has been carried out on the migration type and assimilation of the Greek neighborhood within the American polity on account of the Turkish invasion of Cyprus. The current paper tried to mix analysis within the two fields with the intention to showcase how a historical past of over 40 years could be outlined as diaspora diplomacy. Transferring forwards from this analysis, Greek-American communities and Greeks ought to extra successfully make use of the diaspora diplomacy. That is true not just for the immigrant communities within the US but additionally within the European Union on account of the mind drain. Such communities might use lobbying mechanisms each from Athens in the direction of European establishments and vice versa to affect positions and create a stronger coherence between the 2.


Adamson, F. B., & Demetriou, M. (2007). Remapping the Boundaries of `State’ and `Nationwide Identification’: Incorporating Diasporas into IR Theorizing. European Journal of Worldwide Relations, 13(4), 489–526.

Brinkerhoff, J. (2019). Diasporas and Public Diplomacy: Distinctions and future prospects. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, (14)1-2, pp. 51-64.

Coufoudakis, V, (1977). U.S. international coverage and the Cyprus query: An interpretation. Millenium, 5, pp. 245-268

Hellenic American Management Council. (2020). Inform Secretary Pompeo: Stand with Greece. Hellenic American Management Council.

Ho, E.L. and McConnell, F. (2017). Conceptualizing “diaspora diplomacy”: territory and populations betwixt the home and international. Progress in Human Geography, 43(1), pp. 163-171.

Huijgh, E. (2016). Public diplomacy. In C. Constantinou P. Kerr & P. Sharp (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of diplomacy (pp. 437-450). 55 Metropolis Street, London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781473957930.n36

Kaloudis, G. (2008). The affect of the Greek diaspora on Greece and america. Worldwide Journal on World Peace, 25(3), p29-59. 31

Kaloudis, G. (2018). Trendy Greece and the Diaspora Greeks in america. Lexington Books. ProQuest E-book Central,

Karpathakis, A. (1999). Dwelling society politics and immigrant political incorporation: The case of Greek immigrants in New York Metropolis. Worldwide Migration Evaluation, 33(1), 55–78.

Miller, J. E. (2009). The US and the making of Trendy Greece: Historical past and energy, 1950-1974. The College of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill.

Prévélakis, G. (2000) The Hellenic diaspora and the Greek state: A spatial method, Geopolitics, 5(2), pp. 171-185, DOI: 10.1080/14650040008407685

Rana, Okay. (2009). India’s Diaspora Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 4(3), pp.361- 372.

Rana, Okay.S. (2013). Diaspora Diplomacy and Public Diplomacy’, in: R.S. Zaharna, Amelia Arsenault, Ali Fisher (eds), Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy, New York: Routledge, pp. 70-85.

Sakkas, J. (2004). The Greek dictatorship, the USA and the Arabs, 1967–1974. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 6(3), pp. 245-257, DOI: 10.1080/1461319042000296804

Stone, D. & Douglas, E. (2018). Advance diaspora diplomacy in a networked world. Worldwide Journal of Cultural Coverage, 24(6),710-
723, DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2018.1495712. Retrieved from

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations