Mitch McConnell has performed extra to undermine American religion within the judiciary than any single particular person in our nation’s historical past. But, yesterday, he slapped Democrats on the wrist for failing to respect the judiciary’s independence, the identical judiciary McConnell labored so exhausting to rid all notions of independence.

Precisely what did McConnell count on? His distinctive model of shamelessness instantly led to what stays: two stolen seats and lingering questions in regards to the retirement that led to a 3rd.  Regardless, McConnell wrote within the WaPo:

[T]he Biden administration had taken one other step to erode the independence of our personal Supreme Courtroom. It had published a first draft of radical findings from the pseudo-academic fee that the president created to flirt with the unconventional idea of court-packing.

The president’s choice in April to face up this fee was no remoted occasion. Bare makes an attempt to bully judges have grow to be a core precedence for in the present day’s Democratic Social gathering.

McConnell had the temerity to make use of the phrase “bully” whereas talking of the Supreme Courtroom? “Bullies”? Unilaterally holding up a SCOTUS seat from March to the subsequent January primarily based on “the individuals [in the next election, not the previous one] ought to resolve” after which the final word rush job after beloved Ruth Bader-Ginsberg handed, primarily based on the “President and Senate of the identical social gathering rule” one which McConnell didn’t cite throughout Merrick Garland’s nomination. McConnell calls us bullies?

A number of months earlier than that, as The Post reported, sitting Senate Democrats, together with the now-chairman of the Judiciary Committee, despatched the courtroom an outrageous amicus transient that learn like a ransom observe from junior-varsity mafiosos. “The Supreme Courtroom will not be nicely,” they threatened, “and the individuals comprehend it. Maybe the Courtroom can heal itself earlier than the general public calls for or not it’s ‘restructured. …’”

In different phrases: Good impartial judiciary you’ve received there. Positive can be a disgrace if one thing occurred to it.

Highschool sophomore Mitch McConnell earns an “A” in studying comprehension. As a result of that’s exactly what the Senate meant to convey to the SCOTUS, particularly Chief Justice Roberts. The Democrats know that even the Justices know the charade hidden beneath the veneer of the beautiful and spectacular constructing, the ornate courtroom, and all these great guiding rules. The Democrats wished the courtroom to know that, as a result of it’s so politically composed, there isn’t a cause to not stability it. The 9 justices share only a few qualities, however one factor all of them share? None need their vote watered down by including justices. None wish to have restricted phrases.

Chief Justice Roberts is especially delicate to this as a result of his title will without end be hooked up to that interval in historical past when the general public gave up on having an impartial judiciary. You’ll observe, it was Roberts that saved what had been the clearly constitutional ACA. When the ACA handed, nobody questioned its constitutionality. It was solely when determined Republicans started to appreciate how robust it is likely to be to dig out of the brand new program did they create up “severe constitutional issues.”

Every time we see an aberrant “progressive” vote by Roberts, remember that he’s the one one historical past will actually bear in mind.

Regardless, the Democrats within the Senate see what has occurred with the SCOTUS, the Justices have seen what has occurred, the American public definitely understands (which explains the Proper’s giddiness), and McConnell, greater than anybody, is aware of extra about why the independence doesn’t exist than anybody. He engineered it. For him, to disgrace anybody on something on this matter is simply, nicely, shameless.

Which is how we received right here within the first place.