Is China beating the US and EU by means of its pragmatic method in the direction of cooperation beneath the “Belt and Highway” Initiative (“一带一路”倡议) (BRI)? Regardless of the appearance of the US’ “Construct Again Higher World” (B3W) and the EU’s “Connecting Europe Globally” (CEG), proof from Sri Lanka means that some nations nonetheless look to China for help as a result of ‘no-strings-attached’ nature of its investments. The stark actuality is that China’s “pragmatic values”, mixed with loans, could outcompete the 2 Western initiatives.

The US and EU ahead their initiatives by means of a deal with Western values akin to liberalism, democracy, freedom of speech, and human rights – all ethical frameworks which supposedly result in ‘good governance’ (US White Home, 2021; EU Council, 2021; Yan, 2021; Pleeck and Gavas, 2021; Qureshi, 2021). Conversely, the Chinese language Communist Social gathering (CCP) holds that the BRI has pursued a realistic framework of non-interference (respecting sovereignty) and ‘win-win’ (mutual advantages) (FMPRC, 2021A; Ginsburg, 2021). In a nutshell, China claims to satisfy the nations the place they’re, with investments made in areas or sectors through which they search help (Li and Vicente, 2020; FMPRC, 2021B; Wang and Cao, 2021: 65). Furthermore, non-interference goes each methods: China stays pragmatic about cooperation and urges different nations to do the identical, finally securing mutual political help in occasions of strife (China Energy, 2017; Dezenski, 2020; Jie and Wallace, 2021). Nonetheless, whereas nations do profit from Chinese language investments, China arguably stays on the head of the negotiation desk, with its personal pursuits on the fore (Rolland, 2017; China Energy, 2017). However what does this imply in observe?

The Belt and Highway Initiative in Sri Lanka

In recent times, Sri Lanka has been beneath worldwide scrutiny as a consequence of (refuted) accusations of Chinese language ‘debt-trap diplomacy’, i.e., that China has tried to extend its financial or political leverage over the nation by means of extending extreme credit score that Sri Lanka couldn’t repay – the principle instance being the 99-year lease of Hambantota Port to China Retailers Port Holdings Firm (CMPHC) (Jones and Hameiri, 2020).

Nonetheless, the Sino-Sri Lankan relationship is long-established and has solely picked up pace after the BRI’s announcement. The ties have been already cemented throughout the Sri Lankan civil battle; when the US minimize off assist, China offered investments, armaments, and diplomatic help to the federal government (Marshall, 2009; Sakhuja, 2009). After the battle, when Sri Lanka started investing in infrastructure initiatives to avoid wasting its financial system, China provided various financing versus the IMF and World Financial institution (Ferchen and Perera, 2019; Day by day FT, 2021).

Whereas Beijing has supported the elected governments of Sri Lanka because the civil battle, this help has been piecemeal and problematic, not least as a consequence of Sri Lanka’s official coverage of non-alignment and repeatedly shut ties with nations akin to India (Srinivasan, 2021A; Wignaraja, 2020). Certainly, tensions with the India-leaning Sirisena-Wickremesinghe authorities (2015-2019) proved tough to deal with; as India commenced formal visits and proposed massive investments, Chinese language visits have been curtailed. However, China labored laborious to regain its favor and finally succeeded after Wickremesinghe’s dismissal, when China-friendly Mahinda Rajapaksa was appointed Prime Minister (Myers, 2020). By November 25, 2020, China was Sri Lanka’s largest lender, with loans round $923.7 million (Ada Derana Biz, 2020). To enhance investments, Sino-Sri Lankan ties have been furthered in areas akin to tradition beneath the BRI’s ‘people-to-people bonds’, and ‘pragmatic cooperation’ has been enhanced in order that Sri Lanka could study from China’s governance practices (Srinivasan, 2021C).

The Colombo Port Metropolis (CPC) is at present the principle BRI mission in Sri Lanka; with a said purpose of elevating the nation to the extent of a ‘small Singapore’, it’s the single largest international funding in Sri Lankan historical past with a development value of $1.4 billion (Farzan, 2021; LKI, 2020; CHEC Port Metropolis Colombo, 2021). Nonetheless, associated initiatives train appreciable affect. For instance, the East Container Terminal (ECT) / West Container Terminal (WCT) of Colombo port are central to a dispute between Sri Lanka, India, and Japan (Javaid, 2021). The Sri Lankan authorities unilaterally reneged on the deal for India and Japan to develop the port in February 2021. It was shortly instructed by Indian, Japanese, and US’ sources, together with state officers, students, and media, that China had pulled its weight within the port to dam the advance of the 2 Quadrilateral Safety Dialogue (QUAD) nations (Manoj, 2021; Haidar and Srinivasan, 2021; Singh, 2021). India and Japan finally accepted Sri Lanka’s deal to develop the WCT as an alternative, however hypothesis on China’s function by no means subsided. Nonetheless, different gamers have had their plans in Sri Lanka foiled too.

The US has tried to counter China’s presence by forwarding strategic cooperation frameworks such because the Standing of Armed Forces Settlement (SOFA), which the Sri Lankan authorities has but to just accept, together with the $480 million Millennium Problem Compact (MCC) Accord, which the US terminated in 2020 as a consequence of a ‘lack of accomplice nation engagement’ (Mendis and Reichenbach, 2020; Financial system Subsequent, 2020). Equally, EU funding schemes in Sri Lanka such because the Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+) have been hit or miss. The nation was excluded from the GSP+ in 2010 as a result of Civil Battle, however the scheme was reinstated in 2017 (de Silva, 2020). Nonetheless, in June 2021, the European Parliament adopted a decision to briefly withdraw Sri Lanka’s GSP+ standing because the nation has utilized the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) to detain critics, activists, and writers. That is set to severely influence Sri Lanka’s financial system, because the EU is its second largest buying and selling accomplice accounting for greater than 22.4% of Sri Lankan exports in 2020 (ANI Information, 2021; Srinivasan, 2021B).

In the meantime, China has not dialled down its efforts in Sri Lanka. Along with infrastructure initiatives, China has offered financial help to the nation throughout the Covid-19 pandemic and has donated a big amount of medical gear and vaccines by means of its ‘masks diplomacy’ (Chandrasena, 2020; Karunatilake and Pal, 2021). These donations got here when Sri Lanka was criticizing the West for turning its again on the nation. Conversely, Sri Lanka’s ambassador to China, Dr. Palitha Kohona, has said that China will stay Sri Lanka’s ‘closest and most reliable pal’ it doesn’t matter what the West or India says (Rutnam, 2021). Whether or not China’s friendship in Sri Lanka is real or not, one factor is for certain: Xi is an in depth ally to present president Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Nonetheless, rising criticism of the CPC together with different BRI initiatives could take a look at this friendship sooner or later (Srinivasan, 2021A; Hundlani and Kannangara, 2020).

The query of human rights

As illustrated, Sri Lanka has change into more and more remoted from the West as a consequence of its human rights violations throughout the civil battle. Furthermore, beneath the Rajapaksa authorities, circumstances have deteriorated; Sri Lankan critics have been surveilled and harassed, and fundamental human rights for ethnic teams have worsened (UNHRC, 2021B; DeVotta and Ganguly, 2021). However, Beijing has continued to assist (Singh, 2018). China voted towards the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) decision on Sri Lanka’s human rights report in March 2021, however the decision nonetheless handed. The Rajapaksa authorities now appears to have rejected the decision, which dangers additional alienating the nation from the West and the worldwide neighborhood (Abeyagoonasekera, 2021).

In return for this help, Sri Lanka has had China’s again. The federal government has publicly defended the BRI, refuted rumors of debt-trap diplomacy, enhanced navy cooperation, and so far, supported the CPC Financial Fee Invoice which can additional China’s pursuits (Rajagopalan, 2021). The 2 nations appear to have revered the core pursuits and sovereignty of their counterparts whereas backing one another in worldwide controversies. This mutual, unconditional help – forwarded beneath the discourse of pragmatic cooperation – has ensured China’s place within the nation.

Time will inform whether or not Sri Lanka continues to depend on China for investments, or whether or not it should handle its human rights points and switch to different nations for help. Presently, the latter appears uncertain. Sri Lanka’s tilt in the direction of Chinese language pragmatic values will thus be on the expense of the Tamil inhabitants, human rights defenders, and journalists (Amnesty Worldwide, 2021).

Cash over morals?

Whereas we can’t generalize primarily based on the case of Sri Lanka, it does level to a bigger development in BRI cooperation. Nations with problematic human rights reputations, akin to Afghanistan (UNHRC, 2021A; Marsden, 2021) and Pakistan (HRW, 2021; Sacks, 2021), appear to favor China’s pragmatic method and can doubtless proceed to take action. Different nations struggling to uphold human rights and determined for investments – creating or developed – might additionally probably select China as their accomplice (Faiz, 2019).

Due to this fact, the US and EU could have overestimated the ability of Western values versus these related to Chinese language investments beneath the BRI. Even with the identical amount of cash for investments, China has a transparent benefit: it doesn’t impose conditionalities for assist, at the very least not just like the West does (Dezenski, 2020). As seen in Sri Lanka, it isn’t a query of cash or morals – it’s a query of cash with out morals. Consequently, the B3W and the CEG will wrestle to compete with China if the main focus stays on forwarding infrastructure with Western values. For years, China has been cooperating with nations that the West wouldn’t think about as a consequence of their political methods or human rights approaches, and it has strengthened its personal bi- and multilateral place by means of a deal with credibility and assuaging fears of the ‘China risk’. Due to this fact, regardless of criticism, the BRI – and the pragmatic values related to Chinese language investments – are unlikely to lose reputation any time quickly.


Abeyagoonasekera, Asanga. 2021. “Sri Lanka’s rejection of the UNHRC decision: A shift in the direction of China?,” in Observer Analysis Basis (ORF) Debates (April 1, 2021), (accessed September, 19, 2021),

Ada Derana Biz. 2020. “China the most important lender to Sri Lanka,” in Ada Derana Biz (November 25, 2020), (accessed September 8, 2021),

Amnesty Worldwide. 2021. “Sri Lanka 2020,” in Amnesty Worldwide Report 2020/21 (June 2021), pp. 337-340,

ANI Information. 2021. “EU parliament adopts decision on Sri Lanka, suggest GSP withdrawal,” in ANI Information (June 11, 2021), (accessed September 19, 2021),

Chandrasena, Charindra. 2020. “Chinese language Authorities to offer 25,000 PCR take a look at kits to SL,” in The Morning, (October 23, 2020), (accessed September 9, 2021),

CHEC Port Metropolis Colombo (Pvt) Ltd. 2021. “Port Metropolis Colombo,” (2021), (accessed September 17, 2021),

China Energy. 2017. “How Will the Belt and Highway Initiative Advance China’s Pursuits?,” in China Energy Challenge at Heart for Strategic & Worldwide Research (CSIS) (Could 8, 2017), (up to date August 26, 2020), (accessed September 28, 2021),

Day by day FT. 2021. “Perceptions of China’s Belt & Highway Initiative and investments in Sri Lanka,” in Day by day FT (April 6, 2021), (accessed September 13, 2021), 

DeVotta, Neil, and Ganguly, Sumit. 2021. “The United Nations Turns Up the Warmth on Rajapaksa,” in International Coverage (March 30, 2021), (accessed September 19, 2021),

Dezenski, Elaine Ok. 2020. Under the Belt and Highway: Corruption and Illicit Dealings in China’s International Infrastructure. Washington, DC: Basis for Protection of Democracies Press,

Financial system Subsequent. 2020. “Sri Lanka MCC grant terminated by US,” in Financial system Subsequent (December 17, 2020), (accessed September 17, 2021),

European Union Council (EU Council). 2021. “A globally linked Europe: Council approves conclusions,” in EU Council Press Releases (July 12, 2021), (accessed September 19, 2021),

Faiz, Abbas. 2019. “Is China’s Belt and Highway Initiative Undermining Human Rights?,” in The Diplomat (June 7, 2019), (accessed September 18, 2021),

Farzan, Zulfick. 2021. “Port Metropolis will elevate SL to the extent of Singapore – Mahindananda,” in Information First (April 16, 2021), (accessed September 18, 2021),

Ferchen, Matt, and Perera, Anarkalee. 2019. “Why Unsustainable Chinese language Infrastructure Offers Are a Two-Manner Road,” in Carnegie-Tsinghua Heart for International Coverage (July 23, 2019), (accessed September 17, 2021),

International Ministry of the Folks’s Republic of China (FMPRC). 2021A. “The Belt and Highway Initiative: Construct a Higher Future By way of In depth Session and Win-win Cooperation–Speech by Consul Common Zhao Jian on the fifteenth Annual Silk Highway Convention Hosted by the Central Asian Productiveness Analysis Heart,” in FMPRC Mission Information (September 22, 2021), (accessed September 29, 2021),

FMPRC. 2021B. “Let Us Strengthen Confidence and Solidarity and Collectively Construct a Nearer Partnership for Belt and Highway Cooperation. Keynote Speech by H.E. State Councilor and International Minister Wang Yi At Asia and Pacific Excessive-level Convention on Belt and Highway Cooperation,” in FMPRC Speeches (June 24, 2021), (accessed September 29, 2021),

Ginsburg, Tom. 2021. “The BRI, non-interference, and democracy,” in Harvard Worldwide Legislation Journal (2021), Vol. 62, pp. 40-66,

Haidar, Suhasini, and Srinivasan, Meera. 2021. “After India, Japan reacts sharply to Sri Lankan cancellation of ECT pact,” in The Hindu (February 3, 2021), (accessed September 13, 2021),

Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2021. “Pakistan – Occasions of 2020,” in HRW World Report 2021 (2021), (accessed September 21, 2021),

Javaid, Arfa. 2021. “East Container Terminal (ECT) Challenge: All you might want to know,” in Jagran Josh (February 2, 2021), (accessed September 10, 2021),

Jie, Yu, and Wallace, Jon. 2021. “What’s China’s Belt and Highway Initiative (BRI)?,” in Chatham Home Explainer (September 13, 2021), (accessed September 17, 2021),

Jones, Lee, and Hameiri, Shahar. 2020. “Debunking the Fantasy of ‘Debt-trap Diplomacy’: How Recipient Nations Form China’s Belt and Highway Initiative,” in Chatham Home Analysis Paper (August 19, 2020), (accessed September 14, 2021),

Karunatilake, Waruna, and Pal, Alasdair. 2021. “China approves $1.5 billion forex swap with Sri Lanka,” in Reuters (March 10, 2021), (accessed September 9, 2021),

Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute (LKI). 2020. “Port Metropolis SEZ – a catalyst for contemporary companies in Sri Lanka,” (Could 22, 2020), (accessed September 17, 2021),

Li, Yichao, and Vicente, Mário Barbosa. 2020. “The Chinese language Partnerships and ‘the Belt and Highway’ Initiative: A Synergetic Affiliation,” in The Belt and Highway Initiative: An Previous Archetype of a New Improvement Mannequin, ed. by Francisco José B. S. Leandro and Paulo Afonso B. Duarte. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 203-235.

Manoj, P. 2021. “Chinese language hand seen behind blocking India’s bid to develop ECT at Colombo port,” in The Hindu Enterprise Line (February 5, 2021) (accessed September 13, 2021),

Marsden, Magnus. 2021. “China, Afghanistan, and the Belt and Highway Initiative: Diplomacy and Actuality,” in The Diplomat (September 15, 2021), (accessed September 24, 2021),

Marshall, Larry. 2009. “Sri Lanka – Winners and Losers in Sri Lanka’s Lengthy Battle,” in Le Centre tricontinental (CETRI) (December 4, 2009), (accessed September 18, 2021),

Mendis, Patrick, and Reichenbach, Dominique. 2020. “Can Pompeo’s Go to to Sri Lanka Offset China’s Affect?,” in The Diplomat (October 31, 2020), (accessed September 9, 2021),

Myers, Lucas. 2020. “The Limits of China’s Affect in Maritime South Asia: Sri Lanka’s International Coverage Rebalance,” in Wilson Heart Asia Dispatches (November 17, 2020), (accessed September 18, 2021),

Pleeck, Samuel, and Gavas, Mikaela. 2021. “A New International Connectivity Technique: The EU’s Response to the BRI,” in Heart for International Improvement (August 4, 2021), (accessed September 9, 2021),

Qureshi, Mariam. 2021. “G7 Summit 2021: China’s Rise vs the West,” in Worldwide Crew For the Examine of Safety (ITSS) Verona (July 7, 2021), (accessed September 24, 2021),

Rajagopalan, Rajeswari Pillai. 2021. “China in Sri Lanka: The Colombo Port Conundrum,” in The Diplomat (Could 7, 2021), (accessed September 8, 2021),

Rolland, Nadège. 2017. China’s Eurasian Century? Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Highway Initiative. Washington, DC: The Nationwide Bureau of Asian Analysis.

Rutnam, Easwaran. 2021. “Sri Lanka to advance relationship with China regardless of issues – Dr. Palitha Kohona,” in Day by day Mirror (Sri Lanka), (March 23, 2021), (accessed September 9, 2021),–Palitha-Kohona/172-208343

Sacks, David. 2021. “The China-Pakistan Financial Hall—Exhausting Actuality Greets BRI’s Signature Initiative,” in Council on International Relations Weblog (March 30, 2021), (accessed September 14, 2021),

Sakhuja, Vijay. 2009. “Sri Lanka: Beijing’s Rising Foothold within the Indian Ocean,” in The Jamestown Basis China Temporary (June 12, 2009), Vol. 9(12), pp. 7-10,

de Silva, Charumini. 2020. “EU GSP+ to stay uninterrupted for Sri Lanka,” in Day by day FT (October 30, 2020), (accessed September 9, 2021),–to-remain-uninterrupted-for-Sri-Lanka/26-708245

Singh, Anita Inder. 2021. “China’s Port Investments in Sri Lanka Mirror Competitors with India within the Indian Ocean,” in The Jamestown Basis China Temporary (Could 7, 2021), Vol. 21(9), pp. 7-12,

Singh, Gunjan. 2018. “Evolution of China-Sri Lanka Relations,” in Vivekananda Worldwide Basis (VIF) Temporary (September 2018), (accessed September 16, 2021),

Srinivasan, Meera. 2021A. “Information Evaluation – a notion shift in relations between Sri Lanka and China?,” in The Hindu (July 9, 2021), (up to date July 10, 2021), (accessed September 10, 2021),

Srinivasan, Meera. 2021B. “EU Parliament decision places highlight on Sri Lanka’s rights scenario,” in The Hindu (June 14, 2021), (accessed September 19, 2021),

Srinivasan, Meera. 2021C. “Sri Lanka has prioritised relations with China, Gotabaya tells Common Wei,” in The Hindu (April 29, 2021), (accessed September 13, 2021),

United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). 2021A. “thirty first Particular Session of the Human Rights Council – The intense human rights issues and scenario in Afghanistan,” in UNHRC Information (August 24, 2021), (accessed September 19, 2021),

UNHRC. 2021B. “Sri Lanka: Specialists dismayed by regressive steps, name for renewed UN scrutiny and efforts to make sure accountability,” in UNHRC Information (February 5, 2021), (accessed September 18, 2021),

US White Home. 2021. “FACT SHEET: President Biden and G7 Leaders Launch Construct Again Higher World (B3W) Partnership,” (June 12, 2021), (accessed September 18, 2021),

Wang, Dong, and Cao, Dejun. 2021. Reglobalisation: When China Meets the World Once more. New York: Routledge.wong

Wignaraja, Ganeshan. 2020. “Resetting China-Sri Lanka relations for a Biden presidency,” in East Asia Discussion board (November 18, 2020), (accessed September 18, 2021),

Yan, Liang. 2021. “Can the G7 actually construct again a greater world?,” in East Asia Discussion board (July 24, 2021), (accessed September 19, 2021),

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations