MANILA — When a Filipino immigrant was brutally attacked this week on a New York City sidewalk, the Philippine international secretary went on Twitter and advised his compatriots in america to combat again.

“The reply to racism needs to be police/navy; not understanding,” the international secretary, Teodoro Locsin, mentioned in one other Twitter put up on the assault. “Racists perceive solely drive.”

Mr. Locsin’s aggressive response, which echoed the bombastic populism of his boss, President Rodrigo Duterte, mirrored how Philippine officers usually see the welfare and pursuits of the nation’s abroad labor migrants as a home problem. Within the Philippines, many individuals view these migrants — whose remittances account for practically a tenth of gross home product — as being a part of their very own group even when they’ve made their house some other place.

“Each Filipino household has an American relative,” mentioned Renato Cruz De Castro, a professor of worldwide research at De La Salle College in Manila, the Philippine capital. “The idea right here is that the Filipina who was attacked in New York nonetheless has relations right here.”

“We sympathize together with her as a result of she’s nonetheless a part of the household,” he mentioned of the sufferer, Vilma Kari, 65, who emigrated from the Philippines many years in the past.

The assault on Ms. Kari was one in all a minimum of two in latest months on an individual of Filipino descent in New York Metropolis. In early February, a 61-year-old Filipino-American man was attacked with a box cutter on the subway after he confronted a stranger who had kicked his tote bag.

Each incidents had been coated extensively by the Philippine information media. The Philippine authorities has paid consideration, too.

A few month earlier than the most recent assault, it urged its residents in america to “train utmost warning,” and called on American officials to make sure their security amid rising anti-Asian hate crimes throughout the pandemic.

“The U.S. authorities ought to undertake efficient responses to the racially motivated hate crimes, together with their root causes,” Rep. Alfredo Garbin Jr., a Duterte ally within the Philippine Congress, told a local newspaper on the time.

A few of Mr. Duterte’s outstanding critics have called his administration’s response to anti-Asian violence in america hypocritical, saying that his authorities has a protracted historical past of human rights abuses at house.

The United Nations has accused the Philippine authorities of systematic killings and arbitrary detentions within the service of a bloody campaign against drugs. The U.N. mentioned final 12 months that greater than 8,000 individuals had died since Mr. Duterte started his antidrug marketing campaign in 2016.

“It’s only for a homeland authorities to sentence racist assaults on its abroad individuals,” Ninotchka Rosca, a Filipina novelist who lives in New York, mentioned of this week’s assault. “It’s also hole when the identical authorities makes it a coverage to kill its personal individuals in its personal territory.”

Individually, Mr. Duterte has a spotty file on championing victims of abuse. He has joked about rape, made anti-Semitic remarks and admitted to sexually assaulting a housemaid when he was a teen. Mr. Locsin, the international secretary, has used anti-Semitic language and defended Mr. Duterte’s resolution to pardon an American marine who had killed a transgender girl.

Richard Heydarian, a political scientist on the Polytechnic College of the Philippines in Manila, mentioned that Mr. Locsin’s response to the New York assault is “simply the most recent case of arbitrary sympathy” from his administration.

Mr. Locsin’s outrage over racism in america makes strategic political sense, he added, as a result of the Filipinos who work overseas characterize an vital vote financial institution for Mr. Duterte’s presidential campaigns.

Mr. Duterte’s basic antipathy towards the West “makes it simpler for his lieutenants to spotlight the profound disaster of racism in locations equivalent to America, particularly when it targets the abroad Filipino group, a significant constituency,” mentioned Mr. Heydarian, the creator of a ebook about Mr. Duterte’s rise to energy.

The Philippines can be contemplating whether or not to keep up a military pact with the United States, one which Mr. Duterte has beforehand threatened to terminate. Herman Kraft, a political scientist on the College of the Philippines in Quezon Metropolis, mentioned it was vital to view Mr. Locsin’s feedback in opposition to the backdrop of these geopolitics.

“Locsin in all probability desires to ship a sign to the U.S. earlier than President Duterte commits the Philippine authorities on a coverage route that might be tough to backpedal from,” he mentioned.

Mr. Cruz De Castro, the professor, mentioned that Mr. Locsin’s Twitter storm was a “knee-jerk” response that mirrored his character greater than particular coverage priorities within the Philippines. However the response to the assault from individuals throughout the Philippines, he added, illustrated the nation’s robust reference to its diaspora.

“It’s a mirrored image of our angle of, ‘After we ship individuals overseas, they’re nonetheless linked with us,’” he mentioned, “ignoring the truth that they’re below personal motive and have mainly adopted the tradition and citizenship of their host nation.”

Jason Gutierrez reported from Manila and Mike Ives from Hong Kong.